A sales pitch I've seen here and there declares one should
consider the Republican Party because it has historically cared more about
civil rights in comparison to the Democratic Party.
The pitch asserts that the Democratic Party instituted Jim
Crow laws and has been against civil rights for much of the 20th
century, while the Republican Party abolished slavery, instituted
Reconstruction, and challenged the Democratic Party with a pro-civil rights
stance at every opportunity.
There is truth in these statements. Nevertheless, in its
current form, the pitch doesn't get me interested.
One reason is that the assertions I've seen present no other
pro-civil rights examples outside of the abolishment of slavery and the establishment
of Reconstruction. The assertions also fail to demonstrate how the legacy these
two 100+ year old examples are reflected in the civil rights advocacy of
today's Republican Party.
The sales pitch tells instead of shows. And to get me interested,
you need to show me.
Show me where the Republican Party demanded justice for the
all-black towns that were burned to the ground by white settlers during the
Western expansion;
Show me where the Republican Party fought against the whites
only charters of new cities and new suburbs (for example, Levittown);
Show me where the Republican Party fought for new
transportation routes (subways, buses, etc.) to extend to non-white
neighborhoods;
Show me where the Republican Party fought against
segregation in public schools, advocating on the behalf of the students in
cases like Alvarez vs. the Lemon Grove School District…
Do not mis-take me – I'm not claiming there is no value in
considering the Republican Party.
I'm saying that if civil rights advocacy is the foundation
of the sales pitch,
is something I should be looking for in today's Republican
Party,
Bring forth the receipts.
No comments:
Post a Comment